Grant-turned-loan raises temperature at council meeting

Tuesday, August 8, 2023

McCOOK, Neb. – The McCook City Council meeting turned up the heat in the closing minutes when the topic turned to “Is it a grant or is it a loan” for the NDED Rural Workforce Housing award that was earmarked for the Saint Catherine’s Project. The historic yet rotting building is owned by Adamark Investments LLC, and according to Phil Lyons of McCook, they are not authorized to do business in Nebraska. Lyons asked the council if they are prepared to get a million-dollar loan and make the citizens pay for the destruction of a privately owned property and if they are in the business of getting loans to mitigate the damages he has a few other properties that he would like to have the city consider. Lyons pointed out that if the city ends up with the property that is great, it was sold three times recently twice for $43,000 and before that $144,000. The value of the property is dropping and it’s not good business to buy high and sell low. McCook City Manager Nate Schneider said to Lyons, that just so everybody knows we actually wrote the grant application in two different forms so we could go ahead at looking at the possibility of remediating that building but also, we could go ahead and use those grant funds to purchase the building, and then demo with the rest of that. “Those are the conversations that we have had with the property owner. Schneider stated to the property owner that to work for the city the property needs to be owned by the city, and he agrees with Lyons, he wasn’t expecting this to have the loan revision, but that is what they are offering us right now. This is why we are having this conversation tonight, and there will be an action item that comes with a vote of a thumbs up or thumbs down.”

Vice President Jerry Calvin wanted to know why this “sleight of hand” happened. “It was thrown out as a grant he said and now when we get the money they are calling it a loan.

“That’s nonsense,” he said. “(Were) these funds that were funded by the Legislature” I’m sure as a grant who can just override the Legislature?

Schneider said that right now we are just in the process of trying to figure out exactly where they are coming from and trying to figure out if it will be modified back to a grant or not or do we want to continue with the current format as a loan. Calvin said “when you get a grant, it is a grant. You don’t get to change your mind and say Oh it’s a loan and you owe us the money. That is not the intent, and if we are going to do a loan I would really just want to do it locally from our local banks. Why would we borrow it from the state of Nebraska?”

Schneider said there is a lot of frustration and he understands his frustration, but our best bet is to try and see if we can remedy this back to a grant. Mayor Linda Taylor said there is a League meeting on August 23 she plans on attending to see if she can get any more information on what is going on with the grant being turned into a loan.

Mitch Lister of McCook also was concerned with the Saint Catherines’ property that the city doesn’t own yet and understands the need to remediate the property, but the city needs to own it first. Lister also asked if the city could require certain things from that property. Schneider said they can, and they have helped do everything they can. “They helped board up the windows. They took down the fire escapes, but it’s very difficult as Phil Lyons brought up its private property, and until the city takes possession of the property I don’t think it is a city problem except when we get called for fires like they have in the past or calls about kids in there that are not supposed to be in there running around.”

Schneider said, they wouldn’t want to do anything till they owned it and that was Lister's biggest concern is the city goes in and does the work and then they sell the property back to us after we paid for it.

In other news, Maggie Repass and Jim Lewis filed a topic for Consideration request to allow the use of ATVs and UTVs in the city limits. Repass opened by saying that this has been discussed a number of times and now that the city of North Platte got it done why can’t McCook?

Other cities around us like Imperial, Norfolk, Broken Bow, and Wahoo have made ordinances to allow them. Safety is the biggest concern and if they get registered and licensed. Who would be responsible for the licensing program would it be the city police department or would it be the clerk’s office. Do they have the manpower to do this and, what does it do to the city’s insurance are all things that they will look at moving forward. Age requirement was discussed, is it 18 and older? The good thing is that these are all other questions that other communities have had and moved on from. McCook doesn’t need to reinvent the wheel here, we just need to find the correct balance that will work best for everyone. Mayor Linda Taylor was excited that this is something that we are taking a good look at because it could be very beneficial to the growth of the city. Repass said that if you get enough cities and towns passing these on their own eventually you will get the state to go the direction of states like South Dakota, Wyoming and Arizona and the state will change the laws, but you need the support of the communities first. They talked about if they would just do ATVs or do both UTV’s and ATV’s. The group will continue to work through the right ordinances and figure out the best way to bring this forward to the council for a vote.

Comments
View 5 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Why do we need ATV/UTVs on our streets and how will it grow the city? We have enough issues with our unmarked intersections in McCook without adding vehicles that offer little protection.

    -- Posted by dpwinder on Tue, Aug 8, 2023, at 7:10 PM
  • Unmarked intersections has nothing to do with allowing atv’s in the streets. Should we get rid of motorcycles because of the lack of protection? I don’t own a pickup truck but I do have an atv with a small dump box. It would be nice to be able to haul a few things around from time to time. When it snows I see them all over the streets. How many problems has that caused?

    -- Posted by president obama on Wed, Aug 9, 2023, at 5:35 AM
  • The city has owned this property multiple times and continues to sell it to people over and over again without the means to repair or remove it. It's kind of ridiculous to me that they have washed their hands of St. Catherine's yet again. Yes, getting rid of nuisance properties costs money for the city, but it needs to be done if you want to keep McCook a city that people want to move to. I live by it. It's unsafe. The City said that this last time they sold it that it would be to somebody who had plans to renovate. Well surprise surprise the people who bought it hadn't even seen it and had no clue what they were doing and did not follow through on their promises. Do better.

    -- Posted by cq22 on Wed, Aug 9, 2023, at 9:02 AM
  • I agree with having UTV's as they provide a inexpensive form of transportation just like motorcycles. I understand some people may think fewer stop signs may be hazardous, however, you can be hurt in a car just as easily. In the State of Wyoming and South Dakota, they are licensed through the State just like another vehicle. Cannot imagine that it would be that much more work for the Treasurer's office. Maybe in the beginning a little headache and a few longer lines for awhile until they all get registered.

    As far as St Catherine's. Tear it down please! Stop playing the game of cat and mouse with selling it to someone who has a pipedream. Once torn down then sell it for more money to a developer.

    -- Posted by LOAL4USA on Wed, Aug 9, 2023, at 1:21 PM
  • While Nebraska doesn't allow these to be licensed through the State, the burden would be passed to the Police department. Wahoo has the annual fee of $100, non-transferrable, non-prorated, and non-refundable due on January 1st every year.

    North Platte and Beatrice restrict these to UTVs, side by sides only. All three cities have reasonable requirements and inspections provided by the Police. There would also need to requirements for liability insurance.

    It's not that there can't be reasonable regulations, but there can be serious financial risk the the motorist involved in a accident that goes well beyond their insurance coverage.

    At the end of the day, this is a solution looking for a problem.

    -- Posted by dpwinder on Thu, Aug 10, 2023, at 10:36 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: