Opinion

Working to reduce property taxes

Saturday, June 17, 2023

In 1966, the good people of Nebraska had grown tired of paying high property taxes. They collected the needed signatures on a ballot initiative and they put the question on the November ballot. By a margin of 50.89% to 49.11% the people of Nebraska passed a constitutional amendment that did away with the “State Property Tax.”

At that point in time, the state property tax was nearly the only source of revenue for all forms of government in Nebraska, including the state government. When the first session of the 50th Legislature met the following January in 1967, they began the session without any revenue to run the State of Nebraska. The newspaper editorial pages at the time were filled with predictions of doom. Many described the situation as a “crisis” for Nebraska.

The Republican Governor, Norbert "Nobby" Tiemann, introduced two bills that created the state income and state sales tax. Opposition to the income tax was so fierce, the hearings for the bills took days as the line of people to testify stretched around the block. For the first time in history the Nebraska Republican Party did not endorse a sitting Republican governor for re-election. They endorsed his primary challenger instead. The resulting political battle during the primary so wounded Governor Tiemann, he lost the general election to the Democrat J. James Exxon.

Today, fifty-six years later, we find ourselves in a similar situation. High property taxes are strangling the #1 industry in our state and people are sick of it.

Family farms and ranches are going bankrupt trying to pay their property taxes. People and businesses are fleeing Nebraska or not moving here in the first place because of it. In the seven years I have had the honor of representing the 43rd District, the legislature has not had the votes to pass substantial property tax relief.

This year, the Legislature passed a major education funding reform with LB 243. It created an Education Future Fund starting with $1 billion, with more to be added in the years to come. It increased public school funding by over $300 million. Schools that didn’t qualify for state aid before (the vast majority) will now get $1,500 per student. The Legislature also implemented a limit on annual school spending growth to 3%.

I believe since the legislature has finally passed a bill that provides more revenue for public schools, Nebraskans should expect school districts to ask them for less revenue in the form of property taxes. As Nebraskans receive their annual property tax valuations, they should keep this in mind. The deadline for protesting their property valuation in the 30th of June.

Please contact my office with any comments, questions or concerns. Email me at tbrewer@leg.ne.gov, mail a letter to Sen. Tom Brewer, Room #1423, P.O. Box 94604, Lincoln, NE 68509, or call us at (402) 471-2628.

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Will property tax levies actually fall?

    -- Posted by dennis on Sun, Jun 18, 2023, at 7:27 AM
  • We are missing the point....the current system is not based on what is gained by the owner, it is based on an arbitrary valuation set by people outside of the industry they are taxing. It is based on what that 'type' of property should generate finacally.

    Income tax,(hated but fair) is based on the financial 'gain' the person or persons have had in the last calendar year.

    Sales tax (also hated) is based on the amount of money the person spends. It is not as fair as income tax but more fair than property tax. (Obviously, a person could not spend the money if they do not have the money.)

    Our property tax does not care if a business person (farmer/rancher or other) had a successful year or a disaster. It demands to be paid every year. Now for a business that sells a product that the business itself sets the price, the tax burden can be passed on to the final consumer. Farmer/ranchers do not have that ability. They have to take what is offered by the person who wants their product. Also, they have no control over mother nature. Yes, they have insurance but is usually only pays 75% of their average. So in other words, they have all the costs and get 3/4's of their average income.

    Taxes should be levied on what a person or organization has 'gained' in net worth over the course of the last fiscal year. This is the issue, property is an 'easy' target. We can say hey you have this type of property so it should yield this... Yes, property is owned and used in an attempt to make a profit. but sometimes, there is no profit to be made, yet the owner is still expected to pay a tax on the value of the property that is arbitrarily assessed.

    Property tax is unfair toward the segment of the community that need land to run their businesses.

    Some other method of funding public infrastructure needs to be explored.

    Or perhaps if the people funding the public infrastructure has a bad year, the public services should also have a bad year.

    -- Posted by quick13 on Tue, Jun 27, 2023, at 6:23 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: