Taxes, fees dominate discussion

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

McCOOK, Nebraska -- McCook City Councilors and city staff discussed several view points pertaining to city revenue needs and citizen feedback focused on new taxation, Monday evening, before ultimately deciding to eliminate the previously proposed cell phone tax, reduce the existing land line tax and increase water and sewer rates.

The back and forth discussion featured warnings that the city could soon be facing budget constraints that prevented parks from being mowed and emergency responders from doing their jobs, yet took place during a meeting that included budget approvals for $25,000 city entrance signs and authorization for sales tax dollars to fund $115,000 in upgrades to city park bathrooms.

Mayor Dennis Berry said citizens had expressed to him that they didn't care if police cars broke down, making the comment just after he proposed reducing the existing land-line tax from 3 percent to 1.5 percent and eliminating the previously proposed cell phone tax.

Councilman Bruce McDowell responded that everyone that communicated to him their opposition to the cell phone tax, also offered somewhere else the funds could be cut from in the budget, but each had a different area they believed should see budget cuts.

Former Councilman Aaron Kircher attended the meeting and commented that there was no reason to reduce the existing land line tax and said the need for the cell phone tax was already addressed with the use of sales tax.

"Why not leave the land-line alone? It wasn't an issue until the cell phone tax was brought up," said Kircher, adding that he believed the cell phone tax would have generated more revenue than what city staff had indicated and he was uncertain a need for the additional revenue even existed.

Councilman Mike Gonzales raised the issue of the county moving dispatch services away from the city, which he believed could result in revenue losses and budget constraints.

Mayor Berry echoed Gonzales concerns and said the city would need to look at staffing.

Chief of Police Isaac Brown communicated to the Gazette Friday that when the city began dispatching for Red Willow County, one dispatch staff member was added to accommodate the additional workload. Brown said that position was currently vacant and he would wait on filling it until after the county made their decision on dispatching services, or he received other instructions.

Councilman Jerry Calvin said he supported the reduction of the land line tax and was opposed to any new cell phone tax. Calvin said he was a big supporter of the idea that "if the government doesn't have to have your dollar, they shouldn't take it." "At some point we have to stop and say, it's the taxpayers money," said Calvin, adding that if the city could find the revenue somewhere else or do without certain services it should.

"What I'm hearing from the people on the street is to cut back on services," said Calvin.

Councilors unanimously approved reducing the land line tax from 3 percent to 1.5 percent and eliminating the previously proposed cell phone tax completely.

Also during Monday's regularly scheduled meeting at council chambers the 2012-13 city budget was approved for its second of three required readings. The budget was amended to include distribution of $220,000 of the $329,000 in uncommitted sales tax funds. $80,000 will go towards improving bathrooms at Kelley Park, $35,000 towards improving bathrooms at Karrer Park, $5,000 towards trees at McCook cemeteries and $100,000 will be used to buy down city sewer loans.

Councilman Gonzales said he would like to see more of the sales tax funds used to repair city streets, with Mayor Berry responding that the budget and sales tax use would not be finalized until the third reading. Berry said councilors could look again at the list of potential projects and propose adjustments at their next meeting.

The 2012-13 Fiscal Year Employee Classification Pay Plan was also approved on its second of three required readings. The pay plan includes a 2.5 percent city-wide wage increase, which equates to a $80,357 annual increase, combined with $80,520 in merit increases and additional longevity increases.

The approved water and sewer rate increases of 3.5 percent will go into effect Oct. 1, 2012. The rate increases, anticipated to increase on average by $10 annually for sewer and $16 annually for water, were approved on their first of three required readings.

Prior to councilors approving the water and sewer rate increases Jenny Blankenship with Public Financial Management spoke via conference call to councilors and provided a review of the annual cashflow analysis for the water and sewer utility funds. The report gave a snapshot of the funds for current, past and future years.

Utility Director Jesse Dutcher said during the review that the water treatment plant was now six years old and beginning to show some signs of wear. Dutcher said it wasn't anything the city hasn't planned for, but offered it as justification for budgeting operating expenses at a 7 percent increase in the water fund and a slightly lower 6 percent increase in the sewer fund.

"Increases to electricity rates are also having a big impact, that eats up a lot of our budget," said Dutcher.

The water enterprise fund was shown to be in a better financial position than the sewer enterprise fund. The PFM review reflects a surplus of more than $200,000 in revenue in the current budget for the water fund, that Blankenship attributed to record sales this summer.

Despite the record sales and consistent growth in water sales every year since 2008 the PFM review forecasts water sales to not only decrease in the upcoming 2012-13 budget, but to be lower than the 2010-11 water sales.

The water enterprise fund was budgeted in 2012-13 to have an ending cash balance of $1,950,555 or 176 percent of operating and maintenance.

Dutcher said the proposed model for the water fund showed the 176 percent gradually decreasing over time and added that the item was used by NDEQ for loan purposes and was a great tool to show the water funds ability to repay its debts.

The PFM review of the water fund proposed a 3.5 percent annual rate increase until 2016, at which point the rate increase was proposed to increase to 4 percent annually. Those numbers were forecasted with 7 percent annual operating expense increases in the PFM review.

The sewer enterprise fund, which Dutcher explained had a consistently flat revenue stream which wasn't typically increased by usage like the water fund, was budgeted in 2012-13 to have an ending cash balance of $360,477 or 51 percent of operating and maintenance.

Dutcher said that while maintaining 30 percent of operating and maintenance was mandated, 50 percent was the industry standard and represented having six months of expenses available. Dutcher said the water department utilized very expensive equipment which had potential to develop needs for large amounts of repair work in a very short period of time.

The PFM review of the sewer fund proposes a 3.5 percent annual rate increase until 2015, at which point the rate increase is proposed to decrease to 3 percent annually.

McCook Police Sergeant Kevin Darling presented illustrations of design ideas for city entrance signs to be created at the four major entrances into the city. Darling has been working as part of a sign committee comprised of other city employees that has been tasked with providing councilors input on the project.

Councilors praised Darling's work and asked him to continue with it.

"Darling is very, very talented," said City Manager Jeff Hancock, adding that it would have cost the city a significant amount of money to contract out what Darling had volunteered to do.

The sign concepts focus on a storytelling theme of the community, with the northern entrance sign possibly highlighting the historic airfield north of McCook and the southern entrance highlighting the bricked downtown city area. The themes and overall concept have not been finalized but councilors praised the direction Darling was moving with the project.

Darling also indicated that each sign would have room for two potential sponsors, that would be intended to attract local civic organizations or businesses.

The city budgeted $25,000 in the current budget for the project, which was not spent, and proposed the same $25,000 be budgeted in the 2012-13 budget for the project. Actual cost estimates for the project are not yet available.

Prior to approving the consent agenda Councilman Mike Gonzales asked why a request from United Way to use city streets, for their 12th annual United Way Fun Run and 5K race, was brought before the city council. Gonzales asked if no streets were closed, why was it necessary and explained that other entities were approved for use of city facilities without council approval.

Public Works Director Kyle Potthoff replied that it had been done for informative purposes. Chief of Police Isaac Brown further elaborated to Gonzales that the police department provided escorts and other services to the runners and bringing the item before councilors provided additional public notice.

The run is scheduled for Sept. 29, 2012, and the United Way was authorized to use city streets for the event.

A request from a potential buyer of the school bus barn property to rezone the property from residential medium to business commercial was approved. Rick Klug, a representative of HCC Leasing, said the group intended to build storage facilities on the southern portion of the lot and three spec homes on the northern side.

Klug said they had a similar storage operation behind Quality Urgent Care and typically rented their space to other businesses, usually on a 3-5 year lease scenario.

The bus barn property does have city water but is not connected to city sewer. City Manager Jeff Hancock said there was potential for TIF funds to be used to assist with getting sewer service connected to the lot.

Klug also said that McCook Economic Development Director Rex Nelson was working on developing a portion of a corn field, north of the bus barn property, into additional residential property.

The three-reading rule was suspended pertaining to the rezone, with Klug explaining to Councilman Jerry Calvin that the McCook School District would like to close on the sale of the property as soon as possible, so they could begin developing the former armory location.

The school bus barn property is located on the northeast corner of Q Street and West Eighth Street. The school district has indicated previously it intends to move the operations there to the recently purchased National Guard Armory building adjacent to McCook High School.

Other items on the consent and regular agenda:

A 1 percent increase to the Unused Restricted Funds Authority was approved.

An amendment to a 2009 agricultural farm lease between the city and the Meyers Brothers, pertaining to property located at the airport, was approved for a three-year extension through 2015. According to the meeting agenda the Meyers Brothers have been good stewards of the airport farm ground and were agreeable to an extension under the same terms. The lease includes payments to the city that combine to equal $15,440 annually.

Rock N Horse Lounge was approved for a special liquor license for a beer garden at the Farm & Ranch Expo at Kiplinger Arena in November.

MO Dough LLC was approved for a special liquor license for receptions at the Keystone Business Center in September and October.

Comments
View 12 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • This could be a first in a longtime for a SW Nebr. governmental agancy reducing taxes. I also heard A. Kircher said he was fine with a land line tax and opposed a cell tax. He then said he does not have a land line only a cell. This message rings true with many people; reduce my tax but not others and reduce services I do not use and just keep the ones I use. The entirprise funds of sewer and water have had expenses increase by nearly 7% and user fees increase by only 3.5% according to the review firm. Sounds like we are lucky to only see 3.5% increases.

    -- Posted by dennis on Tue, Aug 21, 2012, at 4:00 PM
    ! Report comment to editor
  • Actually Dennis, I think you missed the point. I did disclose that I did not carry a land line anymore but I did spend 7 years raising taxes and rates on myself enough that I think your generic assessment of why I thought land lines should stay put was misinterpreted. I simply stated that the need for the cell phone tax and the increased land line tax was already resolved by city staff through the use of sales tax funds. Therefore, there was no need for the cell phone tax and the land line tax should have reverted back to where it was as well. It was your proposal to reduce the land line tax even further than what was needed which resulted in either a need for a cut in services of $9,000 or reducing the remaining cash balance to $225,000 instead of $234,000.

    Cutting the land line tax was not an issue until you proposed it without a way to pay for it. I don't mind you cutting a tax but first, you need to identify a way to pay for it and make sure it's feasible before deciding to do it. As it stands now, the city, by default, is paying it through a reduced cash balance but there seemed to be confusion after the vote whether that is what they want to do, so everything is up in the air until the next meeting when it will have to be decided.

    Our current fiscal situation supports a return to the previous rate structure but it does not support a change above or below that rate structure and that is why the council is now in a bind to figure out how they will pay for the reduction in the land line tax.

    As I stated at the meeting, a tax should not be changed or established for any reason other than its need and its need alone. Taxes are to be used purely as a fiscal tool and not a tool of fairness, punishment or politics. If you need it, collect it and if you don't need it then don't collect it. That's always been a very sound philosophy. When we were going to charge pet fees to pay for an Animal Control Officer, I supported those fees and when that position was not created, I proposed to eliminate those fees since there was no longer a need for it. You supported that reasoning then and I hope you apply that reasoning more often going into the future.

    Good luck and God bless.

    -- Posted by Aaron Kircher on Tue, Aug 21, 2012, at 5:37 PM
    ! Report comment to editor
  • I also did not speak out against the water rate increases and if I only spoke against things I didn't want to pay, I would have started there. However, I understand the need for their proposed levels. You are right that we are lucky to only have a 3.5% increase in the sewer since we had planned on 5% previously but water is still right on track with where we planned on it to be for this year at 3.5%.

    -- Posted by Aaron Kircher on Tue, Aug 21, 2012, at 5:42 PM
    ! Report comment to editor
  • AK, the comment was not directed at you but rather about that folks often are ok with taxes if they do not have to pay them and they are ok with cuts as long as the cuts do not hit them. Sorry for any confusion.

    -- Posted by dennis on Tue, Aug 21, 2012, at 7:43 PM
    ! Report comment to editor
  • I think a small tax, like the one proposed by city staff is a wise and prudent way to raise revenue. I belive the tax would be less than one dollar per month. Many people paying a little would generate a useful sum. I doubt people would even notice.

    -- Posted by radar59 on Tue, Aug 21, 2012, at 7:57 PM
    ! Report comment to editor
  • Everthing revolves around what the government does or does not do. Or what the government does or does not allow. Or, who the government taxes or benefits. What does this look like to you?

    -- Posted by bob s on Tue, Aug 21, 2012, at 9:00 PM
    ! Report comment to editor
  • Something that isn't setting well with this taxpayer and I plan to attend the next council meeting is the fact they our money is being spent in places that maybe could wait until the economy picks back up. For example, while I know that having presentable nice entrance signs would be good to have, is it a true necessity right now. Can the existing signs just be updated or the like. The restrooms in the parks, can just enough be done for now to get by. What I am getting at is that when citizens are payin their bills at home that are already on the rise and having to face upkeep and maintenance on their homes and cars and we don't have enough money for what we'd like to do we do enough to get by. Something I think many people are forgetting right now is how this years drought is going to start affecting us very soon. Reduced crops due to lack of rain will affect each every one of us in groceries, fuel, and in turn the farmers will not be able to buy that new tractor or combine for a while longer than they had planned. Which results in lower tax revenue for the county and the city. Just seems that when you are asking taxpayers to pay more for water and sewer and potential taxes on cell phones (which I wouldn't oppose a small one as someone else mentioned) you have to start reevaluating where your money is being spent.

    -- Posted by love2liveinmccook on Wed, Aug 22, 2012, at 8:47 AM
    ! Report comment to editor
  • The city has the most transparent budget process of most local governmental agencies. The city gets about 15% of the local property tax dollar which puts them behind the school and county. If citizens want to have a bigger voice in taxes, they should also review tax requests by the big boys of school and county as that is where thelions share of the money goes. The items for proposed city funding were selected by the citizens at the sales tax open meetings and the budget meetings. The proposed sewer/water rate increases do not cover the increases to provide the citizens with those services. The most recent audits have indicated that the city already collects and spends less than the majority of other cities the size of McCook. Tough choices in making improvements that already have been put off for years (even in good economic times some did not favor supporting the proposed improvements) or delay a big user fee increase for a year by using the current dollars to keep the rates at the same rate. I believe the council wants input and has ask for input. Contacting them or attending a meeting is what they say they want. Just remember that some want rates frozen and some want city improvements and the council can not please everyone.

    -- Posted by dennis on Thu, Aug 23, 2012, at 11:07 AM
    ! Report comment to editor
  • Help me understand this, at first we need to increase tax revenue and now we've actually decreased tax revenue. Rather than cutting back on current services, perhaps we should just keep the existing tax revenue from a landline phones as opposed to playing catch up on services lost, in the years to come. The money we spent to keep the parks presentable and the roads in good driving conditions will be lost if these things aren't kept up. THAT is agitating to me. I hope that reducing the landline taxes so that we don't have tax money to spend is not simply a ploy to demonstrate the "I'll show you" method of making a point.

    -- Posted by Nick Mercy on Thu, Aug 23, 2012, at 9:42 PM
    ! Report comment to editor
  • Nick, I don't think the council would do that. I'm newish to town, but I have seen a lot of good things come from the city council. A bit of tax relief shouldn't hurt the town. Sometimes you need a break so you can get a breath for what's coming up, and from the opinions that I've collected from other citizens in McCook, I think that is pretty concentual across the board.

    Good work city council members. It's good to see that you listen to what your constituents are telling you.

    Sandra M

    -- Posted by Sandra M on Fri, Aug 24, 2012, at 8:30 AM
    ! Report comment to editor
  • Makes one ponder as to the reasoning is all. I can't think of any reason one might lower their charges when they need more money. I'm certainly not trying to sound derogatory, but I just hope that this isn't an I'll show you type of thing. It works....... I do that to my kids all the time, it's a learn from experience thing, and works great when you can't get the kids to put their shoes away at night and they can't find them in the morning, but I scarcely believe I would let them learn by doing when it involves a hot stove. Sometimes learning from experience is hard to come back from, ie, drinking and driving. A second chance isn't always an option. I would hate to rebuild what's already been built is my look on this.

    I agree Sandra, I feel that the council has indeed done a good job securing a safe and presentable city, and I do thank them for that.

    Nick

    -- Posted by Nick Mercy on Mon, Aug 27, 2012, at 5:13 PM
    ! Report comment to editor
  • WHAT? dennis, i mean nick knocking the city? your so negative nick, the lights of wisdom have finnally turned of for you. of course the city is not going to look out for your best intrests, thats what the realist of this town have been saying for ever. way to go nick, your eyes ha e been opened!

    -- Posted by BTWinecleff on Wed, Aug 29, 2012, at 9:32 AM
    ! Report comment to editor
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: