Pillen order denies reality, threatens workforce

In a perplexing move that defies the evolving nature of work and employee expectations, Nebraska Governor Jim Pillen has issued an executive order mandating the return of state employees to in-person offices by Jan. 2. This move, labeled as a step back to the old ways, has sparked a fierce response from the Nebraska Association of Public Employees, representing over 8,000 state workers.

The union’s call for negotiation and resistance to the governor’s executive order is not without merit. It reflects the sentiments of a significant portion of the state workforce, as revealed by a recent survey conducted by the union. Over 1,700 employees participated, with a staggering 16% considering leaving state employment due to the mandated return to in-person work.

Gov. Pillen’s spokesperson, Jacy Schafer, argues that office-based staff should be held to the same standard as those who had no choice but to work in-person during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this oversimplified approach fails to acknowledge the diverse nature of the state workforce. Not all roles require a physical presence, and many employees have proven the effectiveness of remote work over the past years.

The governor’s executive order is a one-size-fits-all approach that disregards the unique needs and circumstances of various state employees. It undermines the flexibility that has become a hallmark of the modern workforce, especially for those who have successfully transitioned to remote work during the pandemic.

The union’s concern is not just about employee preferences but the potential repercussions on critical state services. The survey results indicate that Pillen’s order could lead to substantial workforce losses in essential sectors such as Child & Family Services, services for Nebraskans with disabilities, social services, engineering, and science. If implemented, this could have a devastating impact on the ability of these agencies to fulfill their missions effectively.

Justin Hubly, executive director of the Nebraska Association of Public Employees, rightly points out that bargaining is essential to navigate the complexities arising from the governor’s order. The list of items the union wishes to negotiate, including the definition of remote work, assignment procedures, and exceptions for critical operations, demonstrates a commitment to finding a balanced solution that considers both the needs of the employees and the efficient functioning of state agencies.

The governor’s refusal to engage in negotiations and the insistence that bargaining is unnecessary raises concerns about his disconnect from the reality of a changing work landscape. Remote work has proven successful for many, and the state should adapt to this new reality rather than clinging to outdated practices.

Moreover, the potential loss of skilled and dedicated state employees, as highlighted by the survey, should be a significant cause for concern. Melissa Haynes, president of the union, rightly emphasizes that “if we lose state employees, all Nebraskans will pay the price.” This isn’t just about retaining existing workers but also about attracting a new generation of public servants who may be deterred by regressive work policies.

As Nebraska moves forward, Gov. Pillen must acknowledge the diverse needs of the state workforce, engage in meaningful negotiations with the union, and reconsider the one-size-fits-all approach that threatens the productivity and morale of state employees. A collaborative and adaptive approach is the key to ensuring the well-being of state workers and the effective delivery of essential services to the people of Nebraska.