*

Mike Hendricks

Mike at Night

Mike Hendricks recently retires as social science, criminal justice instructor at McCook Community College.

Opinion

Strangers among us

Friday, December 9, 2016

We think we know people pretty well, especially our loved ones and best friends, but we really don't know them very well at all. The best way to wrap your head around this concept is to think about how much you hold back from the people that are near and dear to you. We hear people talking about how they're an "open book" and "what you see is what you get" but that's rarely the case. All of us have a private side we reveal to very few people if any. Some people call it a dark side where attitudes and behaviors dwell that aren't socially acceptable and that no one knows about except us.

Why are we like that and what caused it? It goes all the way back to the beginning of time when man first walked the earth, long before there were norms, values and morals. It was survival of the fittest back then and the only thing around to constrain one's behavior was someone else bigger and meaner than you. But as man progressed and evolved, rules did take shape. People began to realize they couldn't do whatever they wanted to do whenever they wanted to do it so norms came into being to govern our behavior. This was the beginning of the private side that all people possess because it was no longer socially acceptable to do and say whatever we wanted. As society became more modern and more sophisticated, that private side we possess has grown larger and larger.

The most striking example of this was the presidential election process that just ended a couple of weeks ago. Few people gave Donald Trump a chance because he evidently had no filter to his thoughts. If he thought it or he thought you would like to hear it, he said it, unlike any presidential candidate that had run before. He hid no feelings and pulled no punches and this delighted a segment of the American population who were sick and tired of the political correctness emanating from the liberal side of the Democrat party.

Trump knew he had struck a nerve; he had tapped into something that no one else had ever thought was worth mining and, in doing so, gave him his only chance at being elected President. What amazed me through the whole process was the reaction of the Democrats. They literally put their hands over their ears because they didn't want to hear the things he was saying and by doing that, they galvanized the other side. I remember the night the video was released of Trump's conversation with one of the Bush boys on the bus about how women are attracted to money and power and how he could do anything to them he wanted to do. The Democrats were shocked, even outraged, that a presidential candidate would say such a thing. Lawrence O'Donnell, a Democrat who has his own show on MSNBC, was perhaps the worst, taking almost a holy attitude of disgust at what Trump had said. Trump said it was locker room talk and Democrats said it wasn't because that wasn't the kind of thing Democrats talked about in the locker room.

The Democrats were lying. That WAS locker room talk and it's the kind of conversations guys have every day about women. They don't tell the women and they don't make those comments in front of women but they sure make them to each other. So once again, Trump supporters, including a majority of women who voted, were disgusted at the Democrats' naiveté and their assessment of the world we live in.

Trump spent most of the primary and general campaign speaking from his dark side and suffered few negative consequences for it because he had touched a chord with those people who agreed with him. So what wasn't acceptable conversation in mixed company a year ago now is because Donald Trump has made it so.

It's at least acceptable in Donald Trump's world and if Democrats don't learn how to deal with it and respond to it, they'll have eight years of Trump instead of four.

Comments
View 6 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • *

    Mike, you and the rest of the elite Liberals still don't "get" what the election was about. Your statement in your article shows you don't have a clue. Your words: "Trump spent most of the primary and general campaign speaking from his dark side and suffered few negative consequences for it because he had touched a chord with those people who agreed with him".

    Were you listening to everything Trump said or were you selectively listening to what you wanted to hear to reinforce your negative opinion of Trump? Only the biased media and predisposed liberals like you would make a statement that Trump spent most of his campaign speaking from the dark side. Your insinuation that Trump struck a cord with those "dark side people" is demeaning to me and reinforces your elitist attitude toward anyone that disagrees with you. Trump's main focus was to reinvigorate our economy and bring back jobs to America, revive our crumbling inner cities, and to keep us safe from an open door immigration policy that has already brought Western Europe to its knees. Obviously you never heard that part of his message.

    Some of us conservatives cringed when Trump made some controversial statements but in the end we knew that Donald Trump with all his faults was a superior choice compared to the out of touch elite criminal Clinton Crime Family. The media covered up for Hillary time after time and it was obvious that they were the mouthpiece of the Democrat Party. Isn't it ironic that all we "deplorable, sexist, homophobic, racist" conservatives could see through the liberal and media baloney to vote for Trump?

    The good news Mike is that you are not the only liberal that can't figure out what happened and that is good news for all us conservatives in the future.

    -- Posted by ksfarmer on Fri, Dec 9, 2016, at 5:56 PM
  • " As society became more modern and more sophisticated, that private side we possess has grown larger and larger. " This is an interesting idea. But, most people feel that their " private side " is being more invaded in the modern world and thus there is less of it. More intrusion = lesser private life. Maybe he's talking about something else.

    -- Posted by bob s on Fri, Dec 9, 2016, at 10:27 PM
  • Eleven states have more people on welfare than people working full time. New York and California are the two most populated that falls into that batch. When over half have a hand out to receive it is little wonder they vote D. Those two states are takers while the folks in the fly over country are the ones working to make money to give to the government that gives it to the takers. Surprise....the states and major cities with the highest percentage of those on welfare have Governors and mayors that have a D behind their names. It will be very hard to get the 35 plus percent of welfare folks in New York to vote for the change Trump and the Republicans pushed this last election.

    -- Posted by dennis on Sat, Dec 10, 2016, at 10:21 AM
  • http://www.factcheck.org/2013/01/death-spiral-states/

    Looks like Dennis is a victim of fake news

    -- Posted by president obama on Sun, Dec 11, 2016, at 9:25 AM
  • Sounds the same for dennis as it has for years. Out in left field outside the fence. Yes, people are upset with the outcome of the election. It IS TIME for a change. It will take time to see.

    -- Posted by edbru on Sat, Dec 17, 2016, at 5:47 AM
  • First off, I rarely agree with Dennis in this forum, but I have to in this instance. The number of people who are on the government dole is greater than the number who pay taxes.

    Secondly, I would like to echo ksfarmers statement as well, very nicely said.

    Mike it is very simple to explain Trump's victory.

    We Deplorables are tired of working harder and harder but able to provide less and less security for our families.

    We believe that a person works for his/her money.

    We believe that immigrants who come here illegally generally try to live off the grid. (work for cash and not pay income taxes). When a job is taken from a taxpayer and given to a nontaxpayer, it compounds the problem. The taxpayer is now a tax user, and the person who has his/her job is not a taxpayer, contributing to the fund the former has to use.

    In addition to that is the movement of jobs to foreign countries who have less stringent employee protection rules and no minimum wage laws. Of course they can produce goods at less cost than we can produce the same goods. And those workers do not pay income tax to the USA.

    Please don't misunderstand us, we are for legal immigration, and we are for free trade. we just want the powers that be to keep the USA first in their negotiations. And we want a level playing field.

    We are tired of working harder and getting less.

    I for one would love to have my fathers buying power. My mother didn't have to work, but we had everything we needed, yet he was only a farmer with no college education who ran a average size farm. (and he didn't owe any money to the bank) myself on the other hand have 2 college degrees and have 4 jobs (my wife also has two degrees and two jobs and works 90 hours a week) We have to work that hard just to keep our heads above water and be able to provide something to our children......

    We are sick and tired, we want someone who will keep our interests first and a chance for our children to have a better life than we do.

    Is that really so hard to understand?

    -- Posted by quick13 on Thu, Dec 22, 2016, at 9:25 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: