*

J.L. Schmidt

Capitol View

Nebraska Press Association

Opinion

Opposition forming to minimum wage ballot question

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Nebraska voters will have an opportunity in November to weigh in on raising the minimum wage to $9 an hour by 2016. Proponents say raising the minimum wage would allow more Nebraska families to make ends meet. Opponents say it will be a burden to small businesses and will force them to increase prices or lay off staff to make ends meet.

State Senators Jeremy Nordquist of Omaha and Danielle Conrad of Lincoln spearheaded the statewide drive to petition the matter onto the ballot after lawmakers failed to pass a bill that would have increased the wage from $7.25 an hour -- which is also the federal minimum wage -- to $9 making Nebraska the 22nd state to raise the minimum above the federal standard.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Nebraska ranked 13th-highest for the percentage of hourly workers making at or below minimum wage and second highest among neighboring states. Voters approved minimum wage increases in 2006 in Colorado and Missouri and four other states. State officials in four more states also raised the minimum wage. The rates in border states Colorado and Missouri are $8 and $7.50 respectively. Washington State has the nation's highest at $9.32. Seattle has a minimum wage of $15 per hour.

Nebraska Taxpayers for Freedom spokesman Doug Kagan admits that opposition to the measure, following a successful grassroots petition effort to get it on the ballot, will be difficult. Similar proposals have been overwhelmingly successful in other states. He says the campaigns against those efforts have been weak, but he hopes the effort in Nebraska will be stronger.

Kagan says increasing wages will result in an increase in the cost of goods and services, an increase that can only be passed on to consumers. In labor-intensive industries, it will be hard to keep a strong employment force.

Low unemployment in Nebraska has created a labor shortage, which naturally pushes wages higher, thus negating the need for the ballot approved increase.

A lobbyist for the Nebraska Federation of Independent Business says raising the minimum wage hurts employment and often results in the lowest-paid employees losing their jobs. He cautions that an increase in the minimum wage, particularly on the heels of a recession, simply adds cost to the bottom line for already struggling small businesses.

Nordquist argued during the waning days of the legislative session that Nebraska's middle class is shrinking and the median household income is shrinking along with it. When efforts by lawmakers failed to advance the bill on a 20-20 vote, Nebraskans for Better Wages was formed and paid petition circulators between $10.50 and $12.50 an hour to collect the necessary 80,000 signatures to get the measure before voters. The group turned in nearly 135,000 signatures.

Opponents plan to take their message to newspaper editorial pages, a public speaking tour and social media. The message will be the impact of increased wages on small business and the layoffs and closings that could follow if labor costs soar.

Proponents simply say that it's time to raise the wage, which has not been increased since 2009. They cite what they call continuing poverty and the struggle for single parents to survive.

Increasing the minimum wage is an admirable goal. But, who knows what the right minimum wage is for each business? Who knows what the breaking point will be for each business?

Counting the cost of raising the minimum wage makes sense.

Let's hope that voters consider the issue carefully before marking their ballots.

Comments
View 6 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Poor people tend to spend everything they get. They need to. The money would recirculate and generate greater sales, greater tax revenues, etc. The city of McCook should try to get ahead of the curve here with a 10.00 per hour minimum. Jump out ahead of the other cities. Try to generate more population and a better paid population.

    -- Posted by bob s on Wed, Jul 30, 2014, at 5:24 PM
  • Raise the minimum does not help the poor because it still the lowest paying job on the job market. Everyone else has more money. All you do by raising the minimum is raise prices and unemployment. Nebraska has among the lowest cost of living and lowest unemployment in the country. Why throw these away? This minimum wage hike will make Nebraska's minimum higher than any of our neighboring states. It will just send jobs out of state.

    -- Posted by TheThinker on Thu, Jul 31, 2014, at 7:57 AM
  • It may well be that it does not help the poor in the long run. Hard to say. But ,it would likely help the city grow. The city has a continual decline in population. People don't like to admit this, but it is true. A higher minimum wage would keep younger people here. It would also attract more younger people who may want the benefits of small town living without the burden of big town problems. As it is, there is a premium paid for small town living. Look at the wages in large cities as compared to small cities. It costs a lot for a young couple to live in a small town. If they have to give up less, they may stay.

    -- Posted by bob s on Thu, Jul 31, 2014, at 9:21 PM
  • There are a couple of things missing from this article.

    (1) Some people will lose their jobs and actually be worse off, if the minimum wage is raised. Some people are not worth $10/hour and will be let go.

    (2) The freedom that is being lost. Employers and employees should meet in the marketplace and determine through negotiation what wage is appropriate, not an overbearing state.

    If we value security over freedom, we lose our freedoms. "Those who would give up essential freedom to obtain security, deserve neither." Benjamin Franklin

    -- Posted by JohnGalt1968 on Fri, Aug 1, 2014, at 2:22 PM
  • I've been trying to hire laborers for $10.00 per hr for several years, not skilled labor, just labor..... I can't get anyone to bite, that being said, the wage level, specifically at the $10.00 range, doesn't seem to be of any use if unskilled workforce isn't interested in taking it.

    Its simply the 1st step on the ladder to inflation. Raising the wage results in raising the cost of products, and often time the raise in the cost of products supersedes the raise in the wage rate, thereby putting everyone in a worse situation.

    Want proof? What's the difference between a gallon of milk today ($3.49) vs a gallon of milk 20 years ago ($1.12). Nothing, in fact, the process, if anything has become more efficient, yet the cost is more. Oh! I guess there is a difference, the wages paid to do the same thing or less is more now than it was 20 years ago.

    I know it would never work, but just think, if the entire world would instantainiously move its rates back 20 years, then the $1.12 gallon of milk would be obtainable again. Wages would be down, but so would the cost of living, the only reason the prices continue to increase is because wages and profit margins go up and never go down, 20 years from now, we may have a $15.00 minimum wage, but the cost of milk will be $6.28 gallon. No one really gets ahead, suppliers increase their prices simultaneously with the wage increases, we are simply scaling everything up is all.

    -- Posted by Nick Mercy on Mon, Aug 4, 2014, at 12:21 AM
  • Gee, where were all the lobbyists back when we left the gold-backed currency standard? Guess having a government that controls the value of the dollar and controls how many are paid towards wage earners must be something everyone agrees on.

    -- Posted by shallal on Thu, Aug 7, 2014, at 5:40 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: