*

Gene O. Morris

Voice From the Wilderness

Comments from a country correspondent.

Opinion

Let's take another long look at St. Catherine's

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

McCOOK, Nebraska -- It may be too late. There may be no hope. But before the wrecking ball swings, pulverizing the brick walls of the historic St. Catherine's of Siena Hospital, let's take a long, penetrating look at every possibility for saving the large, aged structure in northwestern McCook.

Yes, there are formidable challenges. There's no question about that. Otherwise the Romanoff family, who saved many declining McCook structures in days gone by, would have stepped up, remodeling the steadily deteriorating St. Catherine's Apartments rather that closing the rambling buildings because of condemnation fears.

But -- despite the very obvious concerns about St. Catherine's condition -- the urgent need for additional housing in McCook makes another educated, analytical look at St. Catherine's renovation potential worthy of our time, talent and treasure.

Just fancy words, you say? Maybe. But before giving up on the possibility entirely, I'd like you to think about a couple of things.

First, look across town at what the McCook Housing Agency did to put the old Valentine (East Ward) school property to such good, long-lasting use. Thanks to the housing board and staff's vision, 32 people now have nice, comfortable places to live.

Second, remember Alvina Becker, a real estate woman who worked diligently to get things done in McCook during her time as a marketer of homes, farms and businesses. "Never give up on a building," Alvina told me. "There are always possibilities."

Alvina's passion for renewal was inspired by a relative of hers in Seattle, who made millions buying and fixing up old, downtown buildings. "Where others saw old, dilapidated buildings, he saw renewal potential," she said.

"He saw the walls, almost all made of bricks or reinforced concrete, and thought about what it would cost to construct anything of similar strength and quality today."

Almost always, Alvina told me, his belief was that it was more economical and eventually profitable to renew rather than rebuild.

All this being said, I must admit -- as you already knew -- that I don't know diddly squat about renovating buildings or the amount of risk money necessary to make a good return on a St. Catherine's remodeling project.

I'm just a sentimental sort who holds hope that there is some one or some group with enough ideas, enough expertise, or enough money to invest in the renewal of St. Catherine's of Siena Hospital.

Comments
View 5 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • If it was a profitable project, investors would be more than willing to renovate. Since it isn't - only the government would be willing to renovate it and turn it into a perpetual money loosing venture.

    -- Posted by bob s on Thu, Feb 6, 2014, at 9:24 PM
  • Knock it down, clean it up, and develop it as a business zone. That part of town could use a convenience store and other revenue building businesses.

    -- Posted by Hugh Jassle on Tue, Feb 11, 2014, at 9:17 AM
  • Since I live near it, there's nothing I'd like more than to see it totally torn down and a nice park or new houses built in its place. We don't need more low-income housing in McCook. We need more quality middle income housing to attract new businesses. Right now businesses won't move here because there are not enough nice regular income apartments for their employees to live.

    -- Posted by cq22 on Wed, Feb 12, 2014, at 1:13 PM
  • Renovation would be the right course of action, but on the other hand, removing it and building new homes or an affordable housing project (apartments) would be good too.

    One problem. The old hospital is loaded with asbestos. Renovation would be too costly with all the updating to be done. You can't disturb the existing walls that have asbestos in them. (EPA issue working with asbestos.) That would have to be contained before any work could be done. If it were to be demolished, asbestos would have to be removed before demolition could take place. That is a big EPA issue that would cost many dollars to do. So, it is really not feasible to do one or the other. The right way would be to remove the asbestos and demolish. I hope it doesn't turn into another project the taxpayers end up paying for in the long run. There has been too many projects like that in the city. The owners need to stand the cost of asbestos removal.

    -- Posted by edbru on Sun, Feb 16, 2014, at 5:54 PM
  • I really hate to see these buildings in disrepair! I also hate to see them torn down! The people that built them built them to last and last they did! It always gets back to the money!

    -- Posted by greb on Fri, Aug 21, 2015, at 10:27 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: