- Why ‘Impoundment’ matters (11/22/24)
- Time for reform to ensure future of Social Security (11/21/24)
- A standing ovation for ‘Elf the Musical’ (11/19/24)
- AI’s influence on the 2024 election – not as damaging as feared (11/15/24)
- Tackling childhood obesity in rural Nebraska: A long-awaited solution (11/14/24)
- Polls aren’t perfect, but they help us listen—and act (11/8/24)
- Win or lose: Voters urged to maintain perspective (11/5/24)
Editorial
Evidence that abstinence works
Monday, February 8, 2010
With local schools depending on state and federal funding, it's inevitable that political considerations will follow.
Few programs are more controversial than sex education, and with the shift from right to left in Washington, "abstinence only" programs like those favored by conservatives and religious groups have fallen out of favor. President Obama's budget approves $114 million for a new "teenage pregnancy prevention" initiative that will fund only programs that have evidence of success -- which seems like a reasonable requirement, especially critics of abstinency only programs.
They might be chagrined to discover, however, that a new study by reputable scientists has found strong evidence that some "just say no" programs actually do work.
"Efficacy of a Theory-Based Abstinence-Only Intervention Over 24 Months," followed 662 African American students in grades 6 and 7.
The study included an 8-hour abstinence-only intervention targeted to reduce sexual intercourse, an 8-hour safer sex-only intervention targeted to increase condom use, 8-hour and 12-hour comprehensive interventions targeted to reduce sexual intercourse and increase condom use, and an 8-hour health-promotion control intervention targeting health issues unrelated to sexual behavior.
During the 24-month follow-up, of those taking the abstinence-only class were 33.5 percent ever had sexual intercourse compared to 48.5 percent in a control group. Fewer abstinence-only participants, 20.6 percent than control participants (29.3 percent) had sex during the previous three months, and also had fewer reports of multiple partners than the control group.
If the study is true, federal officials should find room in the budget to support abstinence-only programs designed to reduce teen pregnancies.
Government funding can never replace the most effective means of teen pregnancy prevention, of course, personal standards instilled in the home.