Opinion

The American Energy Tour, Part II

Monday, July 6, 2009

Last summer we saw firsthand the consequences of a short-sighted energy policy handcuffed by Washington bureaucrats. Families faced record high gas prices, grocery bills were higher than ever, and even charities such as Meals on Wheels felt the impact.

During the height of these rising energy costs, I had the opportunity to join House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) to tour the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colorado, where I was able to review emerging solar, wind, hydrogen, biomass, and fuel cell technologies representing the future of American energy. Our group then traveled to Alaska's North Slope to tour potential oil exploration areas. Dubbed the American Energy Tour, it was a valuable experience.

At the time, fuel and energy prices dominated the headlines. Today, even though prices aren't as high and the news cycle isn't focused on the impact to household budgets, the need for a truly comprehensive energy portfolio -- one including every source of energy like solar, wind, nuclear, clean coal, hydropower, biofuels and domestic exploration -- is just as pressing today as it was 12 months ago.

Just a few days ago, I was able to take part in the 2009 American Energy Tour, this time focusing on our offshore oil and natural gas resources off the coast of Louisiana. Members taking part received energy briefings from the Minerals Management Service regarding offshore drilling and leasing processes as well as learned more about offshore oil and gas production and coastal erosion.

Led by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA), the tour offered us the opportunity to see the heart of our domestic energy production in action. We were able to visit the largest offshore natural gas platform in the country as well as to see one of the largest oil platforms in action.

It was insightful to see the process firsthand and to learn how environmentally-safe the entire process is. Louisiana is the nation's largest offshore oil and gas producer, and there are pipelines from the Gulf of Mexico to virtually every part of the country, including Nebraska.

Offshore energy development is an important step towards reducing our dependence on foreign sources of oil. The Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) -- including sections which have been off limits to drilling since the early 1980s -- may contain as much as 115 billion barrels of oil.

Taking full advantage of our potential offshore energy production has the potential to generate 1.2 million new jobs, $8 trillion in additional economic output and $2.2 trillion in extra tax receipts nationwide, according to the American Energy Alliance.

The Administration and Congress must takes steps to ensure America's offshore resources remain an important part of our domestic energy supply, but it simply can't be our only option.

America needs a comprehensive national energy plan, not a debilitating national energy tax under the guise of 'cap-and-trade.' An all-of-the-above approach to our energy policy -- one which includes offshore oil and gas production as well as the advancement of technologies to develop alternative sources of energy -- needs to be on the table.

I am a cosponsor of the American Energy Act -- a plan which offers takes just such an all-of-the-above approach to energy independence, more jobs, and a cleaner environment without imposing a national energy tax.

This bill focuses on more domestic exploration for oil and natural gas; a renewed commitment to clean, emissions-free nuclear energy; and investments in renewable and alternative energy technologies, as well as incentives for conservation by individuals and businesses.

We have the responsibility to learn from the past to ensure an energy crunch like last year never occurs again. By making good use of our domestic resources throughout our country and by encouraging technology and innovation, we can strengthen our country while at the same time ensuring our economic stability.

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • I'm a Democrat who doesn't support cap and trade, and think the House overplayed its hand. I read editorials, comments and letters-to-the-editor from all over the nation. Support for cap and trade appears to be evaporating. Whereas a week ago it was maybe 2-to-1 against cap and trade, it now seems to be 10-to-1 against. The Senate will be wise to heed the overwhelming lack of public support and stop this disastrous legislation from passing into law.

    There's nothing to like about cap and trade. It will make energy more expensive -- possibly big-time expensive. It will enrich a new class of financial speculator. Hundreds of lobbyists have their fingerprints all over the bill. Cap and trade will also drive-out manufacturing of every description. Plus, it's worse than a tax because only 15% of the proceeds from auctioned permits go into our national treasury. And the kicker? We'll never even know if cap and trade worked.

    -- Robert Moen, www.energyplanUSA.com

    -- Posted by Rmoen on Mon, Jul 6, 2009, at 10:06 AM
  • Da Da Da,

    Move the US on to real renewable energy.. The US government bought two US car companies.. Demand that they produce cars with reusable electric packs.. Go to the station, replace the battery pack, and drive on.. As long as the republicans hold to the energies of the past, we will be locked in the past.. I support all the stimulus if it moves us from where we are to somewhere else..

    -- Posted by mickhaney on Tue, Jul 7, 2009, at 1:13 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: