*

Mike Hendricks

Mike at Night

Mike Hendricks recently retires as social science, criminal justice instructor at McCook Community College.

Opinion

Dec. 21, 2012, The End of Days

Friday, February 13, 2009

The History Channel did a week's worth of shows a couple of weeks back about Armageddon and the End Times so I DVR'd them in order to watch them back to back which I just finished doing. It's all some pretty incredible, far-out stuff and I wanted to comment on some of the conclusions drawn in the series.

The Mayan Calendar, considered by experts and scholars to be one of the most advanced and complete calendars ever constructed, even more so than our own, ends on Dec. 21, 2012. The calendar is so specific and exact that it predicted solar and lunar eclipses long before they occurred. In addition to this calendar, the I Ching, which has been around for thousands of years and is used primarily as a personal guide, also predicts an end date to the world as we know it, as calculated by modern-day scientists and mathematicians. The end date is exactly the same; December 21, 2012.

Now, predicting the end of the world has been a favorite game for pundits, oracles, theologians and seers since the beginning of time and most of their predictions were very time-specific as well. In fact, their numbers run into the thousands and, so far, they've all been wrong. Followers of Christ, for example, expected and predicted his return during their lifetime and certain religious leaders have been predicting that we are living in the end times ever since, based primarily on the writings of the Apostle John in The Revelations, the final book of the Bible.

The key to good prophesizing of course is to be vague. The more vague one is, the more his followers can claim credit when certain things happen. We see this particularly in the writings of Nostradamus. His prophecies use words and phrases that could mean a lot of different things, as all the other prophets do, and when something happens that appears similar to what was predicted, those people who believe in such things use that as proof of the accuracy of his predictions.

Critics might claim that some predictions, whether biblical or secular, HAVE come true and perhaps they have. But a clock that doesn't run is right twice a day. The law of averages indicate that if enough predictions are made, a few of them will be correct. When they are, that's when we hear about them from that particular oracle's believers and supporters who quietly leave out the fact that a lion's share of the predictions made didn't come to pass at all.

So it's left up to the individual to believe whether these predictions are true prophecies or random noise and this writer has to side with the latter instead of the former. I believe in science, I believe in objective data, and I believe in facts as we know them. I don't believe in ghosts, angels, telepathic communications, or flying saucers. I believe all events have causes and I don't believe in people who claim they can predict the future.

I also don't believe in fortune tellers, mystics, talking with the dead, witches, psychics, or Voodoo priests and priestesses although I must confess I've used some of them myself in hopes of getting what I wanted. When we're desperate, we'll do anything, right? I invested a lot of time and money in pursuing this particular quest of mine and it was all for naught, because people have no more ability to change what people think and do than they do to predict the future.

I expect we'll all be here on December 22, 2012. And, if we're not, you won't be here to tell me I was wrong.

Comments
View 4 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • "And, if we're not, you won't be here to tell me I was wrong."

    Well said, Mike. If the believers are gone, only you will have eternity to say "They should have told me so."

    Is there an end? Being a Scientist, you should know that when a great deviance of Social Cultures prophecy very similar events, a good Scientist will know to take notice, at least as to the credibility of the authors, plus where and why written. If you didn't believe the written word, you would be spending your life re-proving what others have proven and written, things that have been proven and can be reproduced as defined to be Science. Would you please reproduce Evolution?...No?...You must then rely upon deductions made by your Scientific predecessors, just as we of faith must. See, we are really, just as Scientific, in Creation, as you are, in Evolution. Hmmm.

    Back to Prophecy. As a fellow Scientific type, I have learned that if a Person, or group, Prophecies, hundreds of times, and over half, have already come to fruition, exactly as Prophesied, Deductively speaking, of course. One just might figure to have sufficient datum to expect the unproven balance of the 'experiment,' to consummate as indicated, in the written word.

    May I say to you, and one and all who read these words, that I 'May' (emphasis on 'May') just know when the end will become obvious to some of mortality, and blindly rejected by some, mostly of the Scientific ink (Sort of like the Priests did when Jesus came the first time,IMO, of course).

    If you want to check out my research, come to the First Baptist Church, 1010 E. 6th. to view the video programs I offer, every Saturday at 7PM, sharp.(note, sorry, but this Saturday 021409 has been called off, due to the storm we were supposed to get).

    If you are as versed, in the Bible, as you profess to be in Science, you could be the exact person that I am looking for to help me verify, or disprove, what I am seeing in the Bible, and video teachings. Give it a thought.

    If you desire, e-mail me at navyblue@swnebr.net.

    This is a Double Dog Dare challenge, for you to disprove, Scientifically of course, my accumulation of informational Prophecy (written between two and four thousand years ago).

    Any one else is welcome to visit, also.

    In Messiah, His Shalom, and truth. Arley Steinhour

    -- Posted by Navyblue on Fri, Feb 13, 2009, at 8:03 PM
  • In my attemt to be an open minded compassionate person I try to give every one the respect of considering alternative opinions. As I grow older I have become very leary of any one who tells me not to investigate the ways and beliefs of others.That I should reject ,out right, all other schools of thought.I am especally leary of thoes who start quoting chaper and verse. I have found that when I listen to them, they have hidden agendas that bode ill for thoes who follow them. It also becomes obvious that they have learned one thing, and one thing only(ususlly the bible)and are convinced they know EVERY THING.They also beleive that they are the ONLY ONE who knows any thing. Any one who challenges them are immedately dissmissed with out any effort to understand the nature of the person challenging them. Or consider the questions being presented.

    It seems that any one who chooses to think for themselves is considered bad and are openly persecuted. But these free thinkers are the ones responsible for the edvancement of our society.

    A very smart man that I know once told me that there have been only a few truly evolved, intelligent people through out history and the rest of us have been dragged along kicking and screaming every step of the way.

    Even though I dont agree with every thing he says.... I beleive Mike Hendricks is one of the truly evolved and intellegent ones! And Mr Steihour, I think Mike would greatly add to your program,that is if you could truly listen to him.

    Respectfully

    Karen

    -- Posted by kaygee on Sat, Feb 14, 2009, at 11:24 AM
  • Karen, Thank you for your words. I may not have said my words well, but what you tell me to do, I thought I was asking Mike to do, when I said: "...you could be the exact person that I am looking for to help me verify, or disprove, what I am seeing in the Bible, and video teachings..." OK, so I made it a challenge, and should have been using the softer method of invitation. I do invite Mike, and you, also, Karen. Come, please, view the offerings, and help me to understand from your viewpoint. From other viewpoints, I am able to find truth even easier.

    My offer is for anyone who would like to view, ponder, and help me grasp truth, or falseness, even better. I seek only truth.

    In Messiah/Jesus, His Shalom/Peace. Arley

    -- Posted by Navyblue on Sat, Feb 14, 2009, at 3:00 PM
  • Karen, Thank you for your words. I may not have said my words well, but what you tell me to do, I thought I was asking Mike to do, when I said: "...you could be the exact person that I am looking for to help me verify, or disprove, what I am seeing in the Bible, and video teachings..." OK, so I made it a challenge, and should have been using the softer method of invitation.

    I do invite Mike, and you, also, Karen. Come, please, view the offerings, and help me to understand from your viewpoint. From other viewpoints, I am able to find truth even easier.

    There are a total of seven video presentations, to view all the considerations, so is not something a person can deduce truth from in fifteen minutes.

    My offer is for anyone who would like to view, ponder, and help me grasp truth, or falseness, even better. I seek only truth.

    In Messiah/Jesus, His Shalom/Peace. Arley

    -- Posted by Navyblue on Sat, Feb 14, 2009, at 3:05 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: